Tuesday, December 29, 2009

The Massacre of the Innocents

“A voice is heard in Ramah,
weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children
and refusing to be comforted,
because they are no more.”
(Matthew 2:18, Jer. 31:15)

This week the church remembers the The Massacre of the Innocents with "Holy Innocents' Day." Here we remember the fallen children murdered by Herod.

Most of you have heard the story. Some wise men show up in Herod's court and tell him they saw a star that says a king is born. Herod Freaks out and orders the execution of all young male children in the village of Bethlehem.

This is the Dark side of Christmas. As we continue to celebrate Christmas we must not forget the blood that has been shed over the centuries. Let's also be reminded of the reality of power. The Kingdom of God confronts the powers, and the strongholds in our own lives. The message of Christmas is not tinsel and Chestnuts roasting on an open fire, but a King for a Kingdom that we are called to serve. It's a real hope, but with it comes a real risk, and neither are domesticated.

Today Let us Join in the weeping of those throughout history for weak and defenseless who suffer. May they never be forgotten or ignored.

I weep and my eyes dissolve in tears, since the comforter who could revive me is far away. My sons are in despair, the enemy has proved too strong. - Lamentations 1:16

My eyes wasted away with weeping, my entrails shuddered, as children, mere infants, fainted in the squares of the Citadel. -Lamentations 2:11

Stop your weeping, dry your eyes, your hardships will be redressed. There is hope for your descendants, says the Lord. -Jeremiah 31:16,17


Sunday, December 27, 2009

St. John Chrysostom, “Homily on Christmas Morning”


While many from Eastern Christian traditions are failure with St. John Chrysostom and his writings (his Paschal homily is read every year in the Orthodox church). We in the west often overlook him. As we continue to celebrate Christmas I thought it might be cool to post another famous Homily (sermon) by St. John Chrysostom. This was has been called "the first Christmas sermon"

St. John Chrysostom’s Christmas Homily


BEHOLD a new and wondrous mystery. My ears resound to the Shepherd’s song, piping no soft melody, but chanting full forth a heavenly hymn. The Angels sing. The Archangels blend their voice in harmony. The Cherubim hymn their joyful praise. The Seraphim exalt His glory. All join to praise this holy feast, beholding the Godhead here on earth, and man in heaven. He Who is above, now for our redemption dwells here below; and he that was lowly is by divine mercy raised.

Bethlehem this day resembles heaven; hearing from the stars the singing of angelic voices; and in place of the sun, enfolds within itself on every side, the Sun of justice. And ask not how: for where God wills, the order of nature yields. For He willed, He had the power, He descended, He redeemed; all things yielded in obedience to God. This day He Who is, is Born; and He Who is, becomes what He was not. For when He was God, He became man; yet not departing from the Godhead that is His. Nor yet by any loss of divinity became He man, nor through increase became He God from man; but being the Word He became flesh, His nature, because of impassability, remaining unchanged.

And so the kings have come, and they have seen the heavenly King that has come upon the earth, not bringing with Him Angels, nor Archangels, nor Thrones, nor Dominations, nor Powers, nor Principalities, but, treading a new and solitary path, He has come forth from a spotless womb.

Since this heavenly birth cannot be described, neither does His coming amongst us in these days permit of too curious scrutiny. Though I know that a Virgin this day gave birth, and I believe that God was begotten before all time, yet the manner of this generation I have learned to venerate in silence and I accept that this is not to be probed too curiously with wordy speech. For with God we look not for the order of nature, but rest our faith in the power of Him who works.

What shall I say to you; what shall I tell you? I behold a Mother who has brought forth; I see a Child come to this light by birth. The manner of His conception I cannot comprehend.

Nature here rested, while the Will of God labored. O ineffable grace! The Only Begotten, Who is before all ages, Who cannot be touched or be perceived, Who is simple, without body, has now put on my body, that is visible and liable to corruption. For what reason? That coming amongst us he may teach us, and teaching, lead us by the hand to the things that men cannot see. For since men believe that the eyes are more trustworthy than the ears, they doubt of that which they do not see, and so He has deigned to show Himself in bodily presence, that He may remove all doubt.

Christ, finding the holy body and soul of the Virgin, builds for Himself a living temple, and as He had willed, formed there a man from the Virgin; and, putting Him on, this day came forth; unashamed of the lowliness of our nature’. For it was to Him no lowering to put on what He Himself had made. Let that handiwork be forever glorified, which became the cloak of its own Creator. For as in the first creation of flesh, man could not be made before the clay had come into His hand, so neither could this corruptible body be glorified, until it had first become the garment of its Maker.

What shall I say! And how shall I describe this Birth to you? For this wonder fills me with astonishment. The Ancient of days has become an infant. He Who sits upon the sublime and heavenly Throne, now lies in a manger. And He Who cannot be touched, Who is simple, without complexity, and incorporeal, now lies subject to the hands of men. He Who has broken the bonds of sinners, is now bound by an infants bands. But He has decreed that ignominy shall become honor, infamy be clothed with glory, and total humiliation the measure of His Goodness.

For this He assumed my body, that I may become capable of His Word; taking my flesh, He gives me His spirit; and so He bestowing and I receiving, He prepares for me the treasure of Life. He takes my flesh, to sanctify me; He gives me His Spirit, that He may save me.

Come, then, let us observe the Feast. Truly wondrous is the whole chronicle of the Nativity. For this day the ancient slavery is ended, the devil confounded, the demons take to flight, the power of death is broken, paradise is unlocked, the curse is taken away, sin is removed from us, error driven out, truth has been brought back, the speech of kindliness diffused, and spreads on every side, a heavenly way of life has been ‘in planted on the earth, angels communicate with men without fear, and men now hold speech with angels.

Why is this? Because God is now on earth, and man in heaven; on every side all things commingle. He became Flesh. He did not become God. He was God. Wherefore He became flesh, so that He Whom heaven did not contain, a manger would this day receive. He was placed in a manger, so that He, by whom all things arc nourished, may receive an infant’s food from His Virgin Mother. So, the Father of all ages, as an infant at the breast, nestles in the virginal arms, that the Magi may more easily see Him. Since this day the Magi too have come, and made a beginning of withstanding tyranny; and the heavens give glory, as the Lord is revealed by a star.

To Him, then, Who out of confusion has wrought a clear path, to Christ, to the Father, and to the Holy Ghost, we offer all praise, now and for ever. Amen.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

The 12 Days of Christmas: A Coded Catholic Catechesis?


This week I ran into an article over at snopes. That talks about how some people are saying the 12 days of Christmas song is actually a series of codes used to teach Catholic children about the faith during the times in which being a Catholic was outlawed in England. The true love in the song is God, and the gifts he gives can be decoded as follows:

A Partridge in a Pear Tree
= Jesus
Two Turtle Doves = Old and New Testaments
Three French Hens = The Three Theological Virtues (Faith, Hope, and Love)
Four Calling Birds = The Four Evangelists (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John)
Five Gold Rings = The First Five Books of the Old Testament (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy)
Six Geese A-laying = The Six Days of Creation
Seven Swans A-swimming = The Seven Gifts of the Holy Spirit (Romans 12:6-8)
Eight Maids A-milking = The Eight Beatitudes (Matthew 5:3-10)
Nine Ladies Dancing= The Nine Fruits of the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:22)
Ten Lords A-leaping = The Ten Commandments
Eleven Pipers Piping = The Eleven Faithful Apostles
Twelve Drummers Drumming = The Twelve Points of Doctrine in the Apostles' Creed

Snopes argues that this idea is probably not true. I think their scepticism is valid. If you want to read more check out the article.

Whether or not it is historically true I like the list. As my wife and I celebrate the 12 days this year I am glad that this song can remind me of all the gifts God has given to me.

Happy Second day of Christmas... And remember the blessing of the scriptures that we have one of God's greatest gifts to us!

Friday, December 25, 2009

The light has come! - Rejoice


In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to the light. The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world came into being through him; yet the world did not know him. He came to what was his own, and his own people did not accept him. But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God, who were born, not of blood or of the will of the flesh or of the will of man, but of God. And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of a father’s only son, full of grace and truth. - John 1:1-14

In the west today is the day we remember the incarnation of God himself to dwell among us.

Through him with him and in him we now live!

Rejoice!

Merry Christmas

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Christian Disciplines - 195 AD

Spiritual disciplines are the things that a person does to stay connected with God in their lives. Spiritual discipline would include prayer, attending church, bible study, and any number of different ways someone might live out the faith they profess. They are an essential part of any Christian life. As Thomas Merton once said "The spiritual life is first of all a life. It is not merely something to be known and studied, it is to be lived." However many of the disciplines the church has had are unknown to protestants today. The "Christian Disciplines" series is an attempt to glimpse the life of the church throughout it's history.

195 AD
At this time in the church Marcus Aurelius' persicution of Christian had recently ended. The Church was young. The leaders who had died in the prosecution like Polycarp, and Justin Martyr were only third generation believers. Polycarp for example had been a companion of Papias who according to tradition had been a companion of the apostle John. The church in 195 AD was wounded and wrestling with who they were and how they were to describe the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the context of different cultures and philosophies. In Egypt Origen was studying under a man named Clement who was working to describe Jesus in new ways. Though the church didn't know it another persecution was about to happen under Septimus Severus in 202 AD. Out of this context Clement of Alexandria gives us this portrait of the Christian life.

“The whole life of the spiritual man is a holy festival. His sacrifices are prayers, praises, and readings in the Scriptures before meals. They are psalms and hymns during meals and before bed -- and prayers also again during night. By these, the spiritual man unites himself to the divine choir... The spiritual man does not use wordy prayer by his mouth. For he has learned to ask of the Lord what is necessary. In every place, therefore, but not ostensibly and visibly to the multitude, he will pray. While engaged in walking, in conversation, while in silence, while engaged in reading and in works according to reason, he prays in every situation. "

- Clement of Alexandria195 A.D., Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 2, page 537

Friday, December 18, 2009

Better know an Icon - Iconography -


Iconography is a Christian practice that is unfamiliar to many protestants, and often misunderstood. It involves the creation and use of religious images that depict Jesus, the saints, scenes from the Bible, and always points to something else of greater significance through literal or figurative meanings. Iconography comes from the Greek word εικoνογραφία which means "image writing." An Icon(or "ikon" or "eikon"), although an image, is not painted but is written. They are not simply artistic expressions but rather can declare truth, in the same way we use words to declare truth.

In the same way we have to learn to decipher the meaning of letters so we can learn to decipher what an icon is saying. We just have to learn the language.

An icon is not to be worshiped. It is a window through which we can glimpse some things of God, and because of that they should be treated with respect. Traditional icons leave little room for creativity. Every aspect of an icon has a meaning. Creating an icon is about communicating a truth more then expressing yourself.

Symbology in Icons - to read an Icon there is another language you must be aware of. Every aspect of a face, element of wardrobe, and color has a meaning. Each icon brings with it a history, a story, and a way in which we as readers are supposed to approach it. I admit icons are something a bit unfamiliar to me as well. So please join me in exploring how to read icons.

Here is a chart to help, much of which I got from fisheaters

Hands hands are often shown giving a blessing: the last two fingers touching thumb (two fingers raised) symbolizes the two natures of Christ; ring finger touching thumb (three fingers raised) symbolizes the Trinity.
Hands are also shown with with the forefinger extended straight; the middle finger curved slightly; the thumb and the ring finger crossed; and the little finger curved slightly. This gesture forms the letters "IC XC" (Greek letters for "Jesus Christ") -- the first finger making the I, the curved middle finger forming the C, the crossed ring finger and thumb forming the X, and the pinky finger forming the second C.
Eyes large to show faith in God ("the eyes of faith")
Ears large to show we must listen to God
Position usually, divine and saintly figures face forward; others are in profile
Light Light source shown as coming from within the Divine or divinized Person or persons
Color Gold: Divine Light, Christ Himself
White: eternal Light, the Father
Green: Holy Spirit, regeneration
Blue: faith, humility, human life
Red: youth, beauty, war, love, divine life
Purple: royalty, priesthood
Bright Yellow: Truth
Pale Yellow: pride, betrayal
Brown: death to the world
Black: evil, death
Time and Space earthly perspective is lost and icons have a flatness to them that disappears in Western Art after the painter Giotto discovered the rules of painting using perspective. Time, too, is distorted to show sequential events simultaneously. Both of these phenomena lend themselves to aiding the viewer in realizing that he is not looking at temporal realities, but spiritual realities
Evangelists wear tunics, carry a book
Bishops wear vestments, carry a book or scroll
Monks wear habits, stand very erect

Look at the icon of Jesus and Mary at the top of this post and the colors used in their garments: Jesus wears red undergarment with a blue outer garment (God become Human) and Mary wears a blue undergarment with a red overgarment (human was granted gifts by God)

I will be starting a new series called. "Better know an Icon." This series will pop up ever now and again so look for the tag "icon"

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Christmas Vs Hanukkah




John Oliver and Jon Stewart gave me a moment of zen the other day... I thought you might enjoy it!





Happy Hanukkah!

Luke 9:51-62 Part VII - Recap


A New Kind of Narrative: Letting Jesus redefine stories across time
The call to follow Jesus is given to every Christian in this life's journey. He does not call us onto an easy road but his call has an authority to overcome. We serve the same Jesus who rebuked the systems of oppression, and overcame them. He now calls us in his life giving mission of peace. These verses give us a picture of the depth of that calling. He is not a fix to the systems of this world, but a life completely outside of them. Luke outlines a message for us all, and challenges us to keep our eyes open to the windows, the orphans and the destitute. As disciples on the hodos of Jesus we cannot guess at where Jesus will call us. We must be ready to obey, for we know our pilgrimage in itself will bring us through death and resurrection to the one who was taken up. When you receive the message of the good news, and the call to follow, do not harden your heart, but follow.

This week we took a long journey through Luke 9:51-62.... If you missed a section here are links to all the stuff related to this commentary.


I would love to hear your feedback on any of these sections!

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Luke 9:51-62 Part VI - Prophet, Pilgrim or Paschal Lamb? A verse by verse analysis of Jesus' call to discipleship

This week we have been looking closely at Luke 9:51-62. So far we have examined Jesus' Rejection in Samaria in great detail and now we are examining the three "would-be" disciples. All the pieces to this pericope are pointing to something really amazing. Let's start putting them all together and see what kind of picture begins to emerge.



Verse 57
  • This encounter happens along the journey. Jesus is in the process of fulfilling his mission. Although Jerusalem is not mentioned the larger context shows us his ultimate destination. This man motives are not given, but there is something about what Jesus is and is doing that attracts him to Jesus.
  • The Motif of discipleship established in the travel narrative is seen strongly here. Jesus is not only on a physical path, but one of destiny.
  • Main Point: The man who desires to follow Jesus encounters Jesus while he is moving. In the same way any encounter with Jesus will not find Jesus passively waiting. Becoming a disciple involves jumping on a moving vehicle already moving at full tilt.
Verse 58
  • This verse has a lot behind it. Although Bultman argues that this passage was altered from it's original state. He believed originally it was a parable meant to convey a parable about the nature of human existence rather then something specific that applied only to Jesus and his followers.1
  • There is also a connection made by some to the Gospel of Thomas. Saying 86 in Thomas is remarkably similar.2
  • 1 Enoch 42:1f talks about wisdom not finding a place to rest. Marshall believes there may be a connection with this idea of wisdom and what Jesus is doing here with himself.3
  • Main Point: Although Jesus may have been using this passage to say something about himself, the main takeaway of it all is that discipleship makes us forever pilgrims and exiles on this earth. As long as we live in this world we are traveling along the hodos with Jesus, and their are no resorts along the way.
Verse 59
  • There is a minor textual variant in this passage. Some manuscripts have the man address Jesus as Lord, and others do not. Translators go either way on this one, but it doesn't change the overall meaning of the text.
  • This time the objection was raised by the would-be follower. In the first encounter Jesus himself raises the objection.
  • The call to discipleship is extended to the man by Jesus in this encounter, whereas in the previous encounter the man calls himself.
  • Burying your father was a duty that was uncontested in the first century Jewish life.4
  • Main Point: The life of a disciples begins the moment the call is extended, but the responsibilities of life do not go away. This would be disciple faced a conflict when he saw what discipleship looked like. Following the hodos (remember hodos means both a road and a way of life) with Jesus today is not any easier. Expect conflict if you intend to stay on the path.
Verse 60
  • Jesus response seems shocking, but it is not without precedent. Prophets in the Old Testament had also "broken decorum" for the sake of proclaiming a message. We can see this in Jeremiah 16: 5-7 and also in Ezekiel 24:15-24
  • Which dead bury which? Although most commentators believe Jesus means the spiritually dead will bury the physically dead that connection is not explicit in the text. Jesus could be making an even more extreme statement and mean they physically dead will be doing the burying. According to Nolland the former interpretation could have made sense to a Hellenistic audience, but would not have made sense to Semitic people.5
  • Some have argued that this man simply wanted to go home and wait for his father to die before he left to follow Jesus. This preaches well but doesn't hold the weight these words have if taken literally.
  • In light of 1 Timothy 5:8 it may be a safe assumption that Jesus was not commanding the man to leave a father on the point of death since that would go against the teaching of the early church.
  • Bockmuel thinks Jesus may have been commanding his followers to take the Nazerite Vow, but Fletcher-Louis does not believe this to be the case since Jesus' own reputation for being a glutton demonstrate he probably was not a Nazerite himself.6
  • Fletcher-Louis believes this to be a redefinition of the family of God.7
  • Stein believes this passage to be a pun, but I don't know if the man would have found it to be very funny.8
  • Main Point: Jesus' response highlights the way Jesus saw his mission. It went beyond regular duties. This journey is serious business. Although Jesus does use a play on words he is not playing around, following him is serious business and all other business must be put aside to follow him.
Verse 61
  • This encounter is the one exclusive to Luke.
  • This would-be disciple approaches Jesus, like the first one. Not the other way around.
  • The mans request is the same as the request made by Elisha when he was called by Elijah in 1 Kings 19. 1 Kings 19:20 tells us that Elijah granted Elisha's request and he was allowed to go home and say goodbye. Again we see the Elijah motif emerge.
  • Main Point: This man's request is more then a simple wish, it has undertones of what people anticipated in a prophet like Elijah who was expected to come. If you try to guess at what Jesus' calling is you may be surprised when he fails to meet your expectations.
Verse 62
  • Here is the plow imagery that we talked about earlier. Jesus responds to the undertones of the man's request with a new definition of discipleship. He places his own mission above the mission of Elijah and there is a sense of urgency which is seen in this response.
  • Jesus is not seen as simply a prophet here. He seems to be making a distinction between Elijah and himself.
  • Nolland believes Jesus' harshness is proof of his authenticity9 .
  • Main Point: Jesus is not just a prophet, and his mission is more then people expect of him. His path is not one you go on for a time, or a season, but it is a way of life. The call of Jesus is toil and it is work, but in the end you sow the seeds of peace where God's kingdom is present. He gives the image of a plow as a symbol of discipleship.

A final look: Following Jesus is more then anyone in this passage bargained for. The call is extreme because the mission is seminal. The image of a prophet is always in the background but Jesus defines himself as more. As all this is going on we must remember that Jesus is on pilgrimage to Jerusalem where he will be offered as a pascal lamb in order to make peace. We are called to take up the tools of peace and follow on his hodos.

notes



1 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 834.


2 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 835.


3 Marshall, I. Howard.The Gospel of Luke. (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 1978), 410.

4 Fletcher-Louis,CrispinH T. "'Leave the dead to bury their own dead': Q 9.60 and the redefinition of the people of God."Journal for the Study of the New Testament26, no. 1 (September 2003): 39-68.ATLAReligion Database withATLASerials,EBSCOhost(accessed November 2, 2009), 40.

5 Nolland, J. Luke. 3 vols. Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word, 1989-1993,) 543.

6 Fletcher-Louis,CrispinH T. "'Leave the dead to bury their own dead': Q 9.60 and the redefinition of the people of God."Journal for the Study of the New Testament26, no. 1 (September 2003): 39-68.ATLAReligion Database withATLASerials,EBSCOhost(accessed November 2, 2009), 43.

7 Fletcher-Louis,CrispinH T. "'Leave the dead to bury their own dead': Q 9.60 and the redefinition of the people of God."Journal for the Study of the New Testament26, no. 1 (September 2003): 39-68.ATLAReligion Database withATLASerials,EBSCOhost(accessed November 2, 2009), 51.

8 Stein, Robert H. Luke (New American Commentary) (Nashville, TN‎: B&H Publishing Group, 1993), 301.

9 Nolland, J. Luke. 3 vols. Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word, 1989-1993,) 302.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Luke 9:51-62 Part V - Elijah and The Plow: Jesus' call for new identity

We continue our Series on Luke 9:51-62 today with a word study...

Before we get into a verse by verse examination of the text of the three would be disciples in Luke 9 there is a word used in this passage that is fairly uncommon in the New Testament we should look at. The word ἄροτρον appears only one time in the New Testament, and that is in verse 62. It occurs in the Septuagint in 1 Chronicles 21:23, Sirach 38:25, Micah 4:3, Joel 4:10, and Isaiah 2:4. It has been translated "plow" in Luke.

Luke uses this word where no one else does and he is making a very strong point with it. To understand what Luke is trying to tell us where is a need to examine the word as closely as we can. First let's explore the variety of ways it is used in the Septuagint

  1. In 1 Chronicles 21:23 we read of Ornan giving ἄροτρον as wood for the offering of his Ox. The word is often translated as "threshing implements."
  2. In Micah 4:3, and Isa. 2:4 the word is used to describe the beating of swords into "plowshares."
  3. In Joel 4:10 it is used to describe the opposite. "Plowshares" are beaten into swords.
  4. Sirach 38:25, which is from the "Old Testament Apocrypha" is situated among verses referring to how laborers are important for society but will never be wise, judges, or rulers. The word is translated here as "plow."

In the above examples it is used as a symbol for peace far more then any other example. One creates ἄροτρον in times of peace and destroys ἄροτρον in times of war. As you can see, giving spiritual significance to the plow was not not without precedent in the Old Testament. You can also see spiritual illustrations for plowing in Isaiah 28:24-26, Proverbs 20:4 as well.
With this background lets look at ἄροτρον in the New Testament. Only two other places use the word "plow" in the New Testament. One is Luke 17:7 and the other is 1 Corinthians 9:10. Both of these verses use ἀροτριάω A verb form of ἄροτρον. It is interesting that two of the instances where a plow or plowing are mentioned in the bible is in the Gospel of Luke. The other instance, in Luke 17:7, discusses the tool of a servant in service to his master. 1 Corinthians 9:10 comes in the midst of a discussion on receiving material support from the church. Paul uses plowing as an analogy to doing the work of the kingdom.

There is one other use of plowing in the Hebrew Bible that we must look at before we move on. Elisha was plowing when he was called by Elijah in 1 Kings 19:19-21. This passage a special significance in the pericope we are looking at in Luke. In Kings Elijah allows Elisha to say goodbye to his family, and he leaves the plow behind. Being a disciple of Jesus is not associated with the sword of war, or the mantle of a prophet in Luke 9. It is associated with a symbol of peace and service. Fitzmeyer contrasts the Cloak in the Elijah story with the plow here.1 I believe he does so rightly. Luke is using the image of the plow in a powerful way which differentiates the role of both Jesus and his disciples from that cast by the expectations of Elijah. There is work to be done in the kingdom of God.


notes



1 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 837.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Luke 9:51-62 Part IV - Wanna-be Wayfarers: a look over the three would-be disciples of Jesus


After Jesus' rejection in Samaria we find him once again on the road in Luke 9: 57. This passage is an important piece of the story of Jesus and the way of life he calls his disciples to. The text is not explicit about where Jesus is heading specifically, but we do know he continues to head generally toward Jerusalem. In this passage he interacts directly with three would be followers of him. These interactions do have a parallel in Matthew 8: 18-22, but the context is somewhat different in Matthew and there are only two encounters. Bultman argues that these were originally sayings passed around, that Luke adds context to in a redactional decision.1

The first two encounters are quite similar in Matthew and in Luke but there are some differences. They both record two men who would like to follow Jesus, but are challenged with a high cost to do so. The first is challenged by being told that Jesus has nowhere to lay his head. And the second is challenged that the dead should bury the dead, when he wants to bury his father before becoming a follower. In Luke Jesus is first approached by a man, in Matthew the man is revealed as a scribe. In Mathew the scribe addresses Jesus as teacher, but in Luke that title is not included. The entire context is also different. In Mathew this encounter happens while he Jesus is in a boat near a crowd, while in Luke it happens while he is on the road. The second encounter is mostly identical, but Jesus calls the man First in Luke, while in Matthew the words "follow me" included in Jesus' response to the man. The response Jesus gives seems rather harsh at first glance. he tells the man to let the dead bury the dead. Luke includes an extra command to the man, "go and proclaim the kingdom of God."
The third encounter in Luke is incredibly interesting, but not without controversy. Bultman does not believe this one to be historical.2 He believes it would be to comical in real life. In this encounter a person wants to say goodbye to their family before following Jesus. Jesus replies that "no one who puts their hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God."

In the end we are left with a number of theological problems.
  1. Jesus uses three images: foxes and birds, Dead who bury the dead and a plow. What significance do these images have.
  2. Why does Jesus seem to be sending people away from himself?
  3. How does this text interact with the culture and literature around at the time of Jesus?
  4. The call to be a disciple goes far beyond faith, can that be resolved with how the contemporary church views faith?
  5. The language Jesus uses is urgent. Should we be as extreme in our own lives?

notes



1 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 834.


2 Marshall, I. Howard.The Gospel of Luke. (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 1978), 409.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Luke 9:51-62 Part III - Steps Forward: A verse by verse analysis of Jesus' rejection


As we have seen there is quite a bit of background going on in the story of Jesus' rejection in Samaria. I now lets start putting the pieces together. Find a Bible, open up to Luke 9:51-56 and follow along as we go verse by verse through the text.

Verse 51
  • This passage is a clear break in the overall narrative of Luke, which is why scholars use it to point to the travel narrative.1 When Jesus sets his face toward Jerusalem a new theme is introduced which is repeated again and again until he reaches Jerusalem. The language of setting ones face may be related to Isaiah 50:72
  • There is a time appointed. His decision is not arbitrary, rather he goes because of an event that was soon to happen.
  • The event that is causally related to his movement is his being "taken up". We might think that this is an illusion to his Ascension. This would be a good piece of evidence for those who believe this passage has a Elijah motif behind it since Elijah also ascended into heaven. However there are some who note it could also mean his death if Luke had misunderstood an idiom from the Old Testament. This could also be an illusion to his exaltation.3 The passage could also be referring to a Divine time table.4
  • Nolland believes this verse may have some roots in Ezekiel 21:7, a passage that describes a time set aside for God's Judgment. 5 Although even he has reservations on that interpretation.
  • Main Idea: Jesus is going to Jerusalem which is key. There is a strong sense that God's purpose is in some way going to be fulfilled soon.
Verse 52
  • Jesus sending messengers ahead of him is not an uncommon theme in Luke. In the next chapter Jesus sends out the 72 ahead of him, and they seem to have pretty much the same mission as the 12 at the beginning of this chapter. One could also argue that Luke 24: 46-49 was a sending of the same vein.
  • Messenger language could very well me related to Malachi 3:1, which is directly quoted in Luke 7:21 and might have been associated with the coming Isaiah in the minds of the early Christians. A figure sending messengers ahead of him is not new, and in light of Malachi is quite interesting. The Old Testament prophet spoke to the Israelites, Jesus sending messengers before him into Samaria takes the old language and applies it to a new context.
  • The fact that he is sending messengers into a Samaritan village shows that Jesus intended to travel through Samaria. Although there are no parallels to this passage in any of the other gospels, other gospels do seem to indicate that Jesus went around Samaria. Luke seems to be very interested in showing the interactions with the Samaritans. This could be because his audience was made up of mostly Gentiles.
  • Main Idea: Jesus' use of messengers is for a reason, and it's interacting with the Old Testament and the expectations of the people around him. Although it was not unheard of for a pilgrim to go through Samaria, the idea of messengers preparing the way for God through Samaria was an unexpected twist. If the disciples saw themselves as the messengers spoken of in Malachi they themselves may have believed they were to be in some form an embodiment of the Elijah motif.

Verse 53
  • Jesus' destination hinders his acceptance. He is turned away. Green argues that this is because the Samaritans are blind to Jesus purpose.6 This could be because he is seen as simply a pilgrim or it could have been because they knew about him and rejected him because he didn't fit into the mold of the expected Taheb.
  • Jesus travels do not start out smoothly. This is the first encounter in the travel narrative and he is already facing some problems. As we mentioned in the previous section on Samaria problems for Pilgrims were not uncommon. This is why some crossed the Jordan and traveled around Samaria.
  • This verse also functions as a way of highlighting the importance of Jerusalem.
  • Main Idea: Jesus is rejected because he is heading to Jerusalem. His destination indicates his identity as a Jew. Jesus does not shy away from tensions, or make excuses for his identity to gain smooth passage. He would have known this route was full of trouble, but he still chose to take it.
Verse 54
  • Here the Elijah motif comes back into play. Many scholars see this as directly related to 2 Kings 1 where Elijah calls down fire on those who come to bring him to the King who he had rebuked for seeking the aid of foreign Gods. Early copiest of this passage actually make the connection between 2 Kings and this rejection explicit.7 This variant still lives on today in the King James Version.
  • James and John are not referred to as the "sons of thunder" as they were in Mark 3:17. However we must bring attention to the calling out of these disciples by name. Marshall suggests their names were added later.8 In order to stress the zeal of the disciples. These two disciples named together might operate as a quick and dirty way to underscore the nature of the question.
  • Nolland believes Luke had decided not to include Mark 10:35-45, and may be making up for it here. In that passage James and John grasp at power. here too they grasp at power, but a different sort.9
  • Main Idea: Even if Jesus is not himself making the connection between his disciples and the ministry of Elijah by sending them as messengers, the disciples seem to be making that connection themselves. They are seeking to operate in the same way the Elijah did in 2 Kings 1. Even though Jesus explicitly told those he sent at the beginning of the chapter to shake the dust off their feet if they are not welcomed, the disciples here believe their response to Samaritans should be one or retaliation. In 2 Kings 1 a divine death penalty is given to the king after he consults foreign gods. The disciples may see their role as that in line with the prophets in condemning those they feel are not within their own circle.
Verse 55
  • In this passage Jesus gives a quick rebuke, and not much is said. However their are a number of textual variants here in which the rebuke is made with a bit more explanation. In these variants there is a common theme. Jesus tells his disciples that they do not know what spirit they are of in saying these things. In some manuscripts Jesus adds a teaching which states the son of man did not come to destroy men's lives but to save them. These were probably added later.10
  • Nolland notes that the rebuke language here is actually different then the language Luke generally uses. It sounds more like Mark 8:33.11 We must then ask what does Luke's rebuke language generally look like and why he chose to add a rebuke here. Every other time Jesus rebukes in Luke he does not rebuke a person. He rebukes the systems that oppress and endanger people. He rebukes sickness, demons, and weather. Jesus may be rebuking a system that oppresses people here as well.
  • Main Idea: Although it is probably a later edition in manuscripts where Jesus tells his disciples that they don't know what spirit they are about when desiring to send fire, they hint at something that could very well be the undercurrent of Jesus' rebuke. The systematized hatred of Samaritans, like all systems of hate is a system the extends beyond those who feel the hate but has an ability to oppress both the hated and the hater. All Jesus' other rebukes in Luke overcome the system, Jesus overcomes the system of hate with a demonstration of his love. It is beautiful that Luke places this passage at the beginning of the travel narrative, where Jesus begins to move toward the cross where God's love is most powerfully shown.
Verse 56
  • Jesus is not stopped by his rejection, he is just has to alter his plans. He moves on to another village, but it doesn't tell us where that village is.
  • The same language is used in Luke 4:30 which is another rejection story.
  • Main Idea: People can reject Jesus, but that doesn't stop him, it simply stops him from dwelling with them.
A final look: It seems that this passage is interacting with the overall structure of Luke with two main themes. First it interacts with the theme of the messengers being sent out, but it also interacts with the journey narrative that is introduced beginning at verse 51. On top of that there are a number of places where the Elijah motif enters into the picture. It is important to recognize all of these influences, but you must not to let them eclipse a powerful message that Jesus teaches his disciples. They are not to work within the systems of this world. Retaliation is not the answer. Although the Samaritans seem to be shown in a poor light here the focus Jesus gives them is in no way negative. In fact his movement through Samaria and his sending of messengers to Samaria are both indicators that Jesus saw Samaria as a part of his mission.

notes

1 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 824.

2 Stein, Robert H. Luke (New American Commentary) (Nashville, TN‎: B&H Publishing Group, 1993), 297.
3 Marshall, I. Howard.The Gospel of Luke. (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 1978), 405.
4 Nolland, J. Luke. 3 vols. Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word, 1989-1993,) 534.
5 Nolland, J. Luke. 3 vols. Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word, 1989-1993,) 534.6 Green, Joel B The Gospel of Luke (New international Commentary on the New Testament). (Grand rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1997), 405.
7 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 830.

8 Marshall, I. Howard.The Gospel of Luke. (Grand Rapids:Eerdmans, 1978), 404.

9 Nolland, J. Luke. 3 vols. Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word, 1989-1993,) 536.
10 Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel According To Luke. 2 vols. Anchor Bible. (Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday, 1981), 830.

11 Nolland, J. Luke. 3 vols. Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word, 1989-1993,) 536.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails